Gonzo Theory – Beware of the OPUS Concept – A Review of the Above – August 2010
Beware of OPUS…
An evolving gonzo theory, OPUS is a voluntary inner generation of the dark side of that unique duality of human nature, good and evil. OPUS makes up the basic ingredients of human deception and clever tricks, which is for the sake of the Obsessive-Compulsive Postulation for Substanceless Subjectivism.
In short, the suggestion of such echoes the desires, wishes and desires to be authenticated regardless of what the facts say. Fiction is often more acceptable than reality. We will believe anything if it agrees with the mental signature we have made. Credulity knows no limits. We even invent extradimensional, anthropomorphic, or supernatural entities to express our prurient passions for personal and collective scapegoats, sacrificial rites, ceremonies, and rituals to ensure that others conform to our belief systems. Nobody dares to disagree or disagreement has a price. Especially where the pretext of social customs is expected in a wide spectrum.
From the reflection we see in the wishing pool of personal inclinations, the reflected images stare back at us in the form of self-projected wishes. From there, good and evil, pleasure and pain, gain and loss, post or perish, win or lose, in competition with eros versus Thanatos. So powerful is the sensuality we see in ourselves that we do all sorts of things to negate its primary motivational processes.
The life force, fueled by intuitive energies, fights to defeat the last enemy, death. But, inside we hear the voices saying, you can’t win the end game, eventually you’ll have to give up. This reflects the psycho-sexual dynamic of human intentions being completely self-focused as opposed to other-focused. In short, its logistical instigation from the cause-effect continuum of primary human thought processes stems significantly from the core of free will.
Ah, but the main direction of that unique voice, the libidinous inclinations that fuel lascivious intentions, is singularly focused on self-gratification. This, at all costs, for the lofty heights of self-promotion. Working with the three puppets of the psychopath, the paranormal, political and planetary conspiracies distract and circumvent the need for common sense. There is a duality of choice in this deliberate self-interest for this level of thought, to do or not to do. As for the gonzo theory, that is the strong sense of investigative skepticism, the cynical attribution towards fallacies of inference, all animated by a practitioner’s point of view of the real world of experience. And, generously flavored with a healthy dose of satirical humor to poke fun at the pious pontification of pseudoscientists. Especially those in the “sacred” halls of academia, snug in the ivory towers of the so-called “behavioral and social sciences.”
Naturally, the gonzo theory scoffs at silly notions backed by specious arguments based on hasty unproven generalizations against the reality of human malice and terror. Their experiential diversity goes against the orthodox dogma of so-called “experts” who like shortcuts to the validity of the evidentiary factors for their claims.
For example, many times if you read the fide bone of a so-called “expert” on the Internet, on his so-called “expert” reference site, it will mostly be extraordinarily long with excessive use of the personal pronoun – “I”. Also, you can see words like “expert”, “nationally recognized”, “trained by experts”, “certified”, etc. You’ll also usually find a very dramatic photograph, which can project a glamorous image of proclaimed notoriety and special authority.
Self interest is everywhere. From the cognitive bias, subjective validation is part of our daily interpersonal social dealings. OPUS is very artificial. Here’s what you need to do to make sure the illusions hide the facts. Particularly if you are running for office and want to mislead the public. You can generally rely on the fact that most people won’t do their homework or ask probing questions or do their own research. Therefore, keep the message simple, general, and unproblematic, as in fortune-telling or a cold reading. Discard enough stuff that something sticks and seems to make sense.
Appeal to emotion at every opportunity. Like in criminal profiling, for example. Ensure immediate gratification to make people feel good. Sentiment always trumps logical deduction. Reinforce faulty conclusions to safeguard unfactual and questionable belief systems. Give people hope that they are always right and that life is full of ethical absolutes that reinforce “morality and meaning” regardless. Good luck!